FLMX vs VYM
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FLMX delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLMX | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $86M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.88% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 39 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +12.99% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.74% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.21% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 3, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
FLMX vs VYM Performance
Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF (FLMX) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLMX returned +29.74% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, FLMX is up 12.99% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, FLMX compounded at +11.21% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLMX has the edge at +7.19% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLMX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.7% for FLMX and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLMX charges 0.19% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $4 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLMX currently yields 3.88% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
FLMX and VYM share 0 holdings out of 593 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLMX or VYM?
FLMX has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLMX or VYM?
Over the past year FLMX returned +29.74% vs +26.12% for VYM, so FLMX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLMX annualized +7.19% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLMX or VYM?
FLMX has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FLMX -52.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both FLMX and VYM?
FLMX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLMX and VYM?
FLMX and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 593 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLMX or VYM?
FLMX yields 3.88% while VYM yields 2.86%, so FLMX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.