FLSW vs IVV
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLSW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $84M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.84% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.65% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.06% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 6, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
FLSW vs IVV Performance
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FLSW returned +16.84% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, FLSW is up 7.98% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, FLSW compounded at +14.65% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.06% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLSW has the edge at +9.15% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLSW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for FLSW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLSW charges 0.09% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLSW currently yields 2.28% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FLSW and IVV share 0 holdings out of 554 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLSW or IVV?
FLSW has an expense ratio of 0.09% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLSW or IVV?
Over the past year FLSW returned +16.84% vs +20.94% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLSW annualized +9.15% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLSW or IVV?
FLSW has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FLSW -28.2% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FLSW and IVV?
FLSW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLSW and IVV?
FLSW and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 554 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLSW or IVV?
FLSW yields 2.28% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FLSW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.