FLSW vs VTI
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLSW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $84M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 54 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.28% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.52% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.12% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.41% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 6, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
FLSW vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLSW returned +19.52% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, FLSW is up 9.28% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, FLSW compounded at +15.12% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.41% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, FLSW has the edge at +9.30% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLSW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for FLSW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLSW charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLSW currently yields 2.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FLSW and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2836 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLSW or VTI?
FLSW has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLSW or VTI?
Over the past year FLSW returned +19.52% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLSW annualized +9.30% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLSW or VTI?
FLSW has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FLSW -28.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FLSW and VTI?
FLSW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLSW and VTI?
FLSW and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2836 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLSW or VTI?
FLSW yields 2.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FLSW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.