FLSW vs VTI
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FLSW or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLSW | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $82M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.28% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 54 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +2.82% | +12.34%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.54% | +18.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.00% | +20.62%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.53% | +11.68%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 16.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,720 | $17,373Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 6, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 8, 2018 to Sep 9, 2026 (8.6 years).
FLSW vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.6 years both funds cover.
FLSW vs VTI Performance
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF (FLSW) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLSW returned +10.54% while VTI returned +18.37%. Year to date, FLSW is up 2.82% versus a gain of 12.34% for VTI.
Over three years, FLSW compounded at +13.00% per year against +20.62% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.53% and +11.68% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.93% annualized vs +8.47%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.4% for FLSW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for FLSW and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLSW charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLSW currently yields 2.28% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 50 holdings in FLSW and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 98.8% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FLSW and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 54 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FLSW and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLSW or VTI?
FLSW has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLSW or VTI?
Over the past year FLSW returned +10.54% vs +18.37% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), FLSW annualized +8.47% vs +13.93% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLSW or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.4% for FLSW. Worst drawdown: FLSW -28.2% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FLSW and VTI?
FLSW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLSW or VTI?
FLSW yields 2.28% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FLSW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FLSW?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.