FLTR vs VOO
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLTR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.9B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.63% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 454 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.78% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.85% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.93% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.65% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 25, 2011 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLTR vs VOO Performance
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLTR returned +4.85% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, FLTR is up 2.78% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, FLTR compounded at +5.93% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.65% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 13.2% for FLTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.9% for FLTR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLTR charges 0.14% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $3 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLTR currently yields 4.63% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLTR and VOO share 0 holdings out of 758 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLTR or VOO?
FLTR has an expense ratio of 0.14% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLTR or VOO?
Over the past year FLTR returned +4.85% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), FLTR annualized -2.86% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLTR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 13.2% for FLTR. Worst drawdown: FLTR -58.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLTR and VOO?
FLTR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLTR and VOO?
FLTR and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 758 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLTR or VOO?
FLTR yields 4.63% while VOO yields 1.08%, so FLTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.