FMET vs VXUS
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, FMET or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMET | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $44M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 64 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +9.88% | +14.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.93% | +21.99%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.44% | +20.89%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.48% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -29.2% | -20.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $16,745 | $17,235Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 21, 2022 to Sep 22, 2026 (4.4 years).
FMET vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
FMET vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FMET returned +4.93% while VXUS returned +21.99%. Year to date, FMET is up 9.88% versus a gain of 14.94% for VXUS.
Over three years, FMET compounded at +19.44% per year against +20.89% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +13.17% annualized vs +12.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.2% for FMET and -20.2% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMET charges 0.39% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $5 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMET currently yields 0.49% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 13.1% of FMET's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
FMET and VXUS share little of their money.
11 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in FMET and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 64 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FMET | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9999:KYNetease Inc | 3.10% | 0.11% | 2.99% |
| 035420:KRNaver Corp | 2.26% | 0.05% | 2.21% |
| 3659:JPNexon Co Ltd | 1.89% | 0.01% | 1.88% |
| 259960:KRKrafton Inc | 1.22% | 0.01% | 1.21% |
| 3697:JPShift Inc | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.86% |
| 36570:KRNcsoft Corp | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.86% |
| 3778:JPSakura Internet Inc | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| 251270:KRNetmarble Corp | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| 263750:KRPearl Abyss Corp | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.57% |
| 1415:HKCowell E Holdings Inc | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.56% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FMET and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMET or VXUS?
FMET has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FMET or VXUS?
Over the past year FMET returned +4.93% vs +21.99% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FMET annualized +12.43% vs +13.17% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FMET or VXUS?
FMET has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FMET -29.2% vs VXUS -20.2%.
Should I hold both FMET and VXUS?
FMET and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FMET and VXUS?
At least 13.1% of FMET's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in FMET and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMET or VXUS?
FMET yields 0.49% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than FMET?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.