FMET vs VOO
Fidelity Metaverse ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FMET | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $44M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 55 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +6.35% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.63% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.92% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FMET vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FMET returned +8.63% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, FMET is up 6.35% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, FMET compounded at +15.92% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.2% for FMET and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FMET charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FMET currently yields 0.52% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FMET and VOO share 16 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FMET or VOO?
FMET has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FMET or VOO?
Over the past year FMET returned +8.63% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), FMET annualized +11.93% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FMET or VOO?
FMET has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FMET -29.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FMET and VOO?
FMET and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FMET and VOO?
FMET and VOO share 16 common holdings with a 20.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FMET or VOO?
FMET yields 0.52% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.