FNDF vs VXUS
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, FNDF or VXUS?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FNDF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNDF | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $26.1B | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.01% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 906 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +23.09%Best | +15.71% |
| 1Y Return | +36.50%Best | +25.07% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.29%Best | +20.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.82%Best | +9.21% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5% | 14.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.0% | -39.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,957Best | $15,535 |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 15, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 15, 2013 to Sep 8, 2026 (13.1 years).
FNDF vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.1 years both funds cover.
FNDF vs VXUS Performance
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNDF returned +36.50% while VXUS returned +25.07%. Year to date, FNDF is up 23.09% versus a gain of 15.71% for VXUS.
Over three years, FNDF compounded at +24.29% per year against +20.30% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +14.82% and +9.21% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FNDF has the edge at +7.83% annualized vs +5.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNDF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 14.5% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.0% for FNDF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNDF charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNDF currently yields 3.01% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 68.0% of FNDF's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
629 positions in common, counted across the 872 positions we hold weights for in FNDF and 8,092 in VXUS, against full books of 906 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNDF | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 000660:KRSk Hynix | 0.77% | 2.17% | 1.40% |
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv | 0.43% | 1.70% | 1.27% |
| TTE:PATOTALENERGIES SE | 1.74% | 0.33% | 1.41% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 1.17% | 0.72% | 0.45% |
| BHP:AUBhp Group Ltd. (Aud Shares) | 1.12% | 0.30% | 0.82% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 0.76% | 0.59% | 0.17% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag – Class N | 0.66% | 0.65% | 0.01% |
| RY:CARoyal Bank of Canada | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.06% |
| SIE:SGSiemens AG__0 | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.02% |
| AZN:LNAstrazeneca Plc | 0.38% | 0.62% | 0.24% |
68.0% of FNDF is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNDF or VXUS?
FNDF has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNDF or VXUS?
Over the past year FNDF returned +36.50% vs +25.07% for VXUS, so FNDF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FNDF annualized +7.83% vs +5.99% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNDF or VXUS?
FNDF has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 14.5% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FNDF -44.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FNDF and VXUS?
FNDF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNDF and VXUS?
At least 68.0% of FNDF's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 629 positions in common, counted across the 872 positions we hold weights for in FNDF and 8,092 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNDF or VXUS?
FNDF yields 3.01% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so FNDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than FNDF?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FNDF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.