FNDF vs VXUS
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FNDF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNDF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $24.6B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.11% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 909 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +20.71% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.06% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.73% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.14% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 15, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FNDF vs VXUS Performance
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNDF returned +38.06% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, FNDF is up 20.71% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, FNDF compounded at +23.73% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +14.14% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FNDF has the edge at +7.72% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNDF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.0% for FNDF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNDF charges 0.25% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $5 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNDF currently yields 3.11% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FNDF and VXUS share 647 holdings out of 8056 unique holdings combined, representing a 35.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNDF or VXUS?
FNDF has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $20 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FNDF or VXUS?
Over the past year FNDF returned +38.06% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so FNDF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FNDF annualized +7.72% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FNDF or VXUS?
FNDF has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FNDF -44.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FNDF and VXUS?
FNDF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FNDF and VXUS?
FNDF and VXUS share 647 common holdings with a 35.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8056 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNDF or VXUS?
FNDF yields 3.11% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so FNDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.