FORH vs QQQ
Formidable ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FORH | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.19% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $20M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.83% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +3.09% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.02% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.50% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.48% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Formidable Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 29, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FORH vs QQQ Performance
Formidable ETF (FORH) is a ETF from Formidable Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FORH returned +9.02% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, FORH is up 3.09% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, FORH compounded at +4.50% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +2.48% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.4% for FORH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.7% for FORH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FORH charges 1.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $119 vs $18 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FORH currently yields 1.83% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FORH and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 138 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FORH or QQQ?
FORH has an expense ratio of 1.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FORH or QQQ?
Over the past year FORH returned +9.02% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FORH annualized +1.66% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FORH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.4% for FORH. Worst drawdown: FORH -20.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FORH and QQQ?
FORH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FORH and QQQ?
FORH and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 138 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FORH or QQQ?
FORH yields 1.83% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FORH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.