FRTY vs VTI
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FRTY or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FRTY led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FRTY | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $155M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.18% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +11.28% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.68% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.72%Best | +23.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.59% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.1% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,364 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Alger | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 1, 2021 to Oct 2, 2026 (5.6 years).
FRTY vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.6 years both funds cover.
FRTY vs VTI Performance
Alger Mid Cap 40 ETF (FRTY) is an ETF from Alger and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FRTY returned +4.68% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, FRTY is up 11.28% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, FRTY compounded at +26.72% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.59% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +3.67%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FRTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.1% for FRTY and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FRTY charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRTY currently yields 0.18% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
74.6% of FRTY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.3% of VTI's money is in holdings FRTY also owns.
Most of FRTY is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
34 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in FRTY and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 43 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,117 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FRTY (95.3% of the fund), and 3 for FRTY that do not appear in VTI (20.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FRTY | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TWSTTwist Bioscience Corp. | 6.41% | 0.01% | 6.40% |
| FWONKNew Liberty Formula One Series C | 4.55% | 0.03% | 4.52% |
| RGENRepligen Corp | 4.19% | 0.01% | 4.18% |
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 3.70% | 0.12% | 3.58% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 3.50% | 0.13% | 3.37% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 3.24% | 0.08% | 3.16% |
| ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc | 3.05% | 0.02% | 3.03% |
| GHGuardant Health, Inc | 3.01% | 0.03% | 2.98% |
| ROLLRbc Bearings Inc | 2.87% | 0.02% | 2.85% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 2.76% | 0.09% | 2.67% |
74.6% of FRTY is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FRTY or VTI?
FRTY has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FRTY or VTI?
Over the past year FRTY returned +4.68% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FRTY annualized +3.67% vs +13.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FRTY or VTI?
FRTY has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FRTY -53.1% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both FRTY and VTI?
FRTY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FRTY and VTI?
74.6% of FRTY's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.3% of VTI's is in holdings FRTY also owns. They hold 34 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in FRTY and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FRTY or VTI?
FRTY yields 0.18% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FRTY?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FRTY led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.