FRWD vs IVV

FRWD vs IVV

Which is better, FRWD or IVV?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.3%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFRWDIVV
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%Best
AUM$277M$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.06%
Holdings27508
YTD Return+27.34%Best+12.51%
1Y Return-+17.57%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Top 10 Weight53.3%37.9%Best
Fund FamilyNomura Asset Management Co LtdiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 13, 2026May 15, 2000

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FRWD vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FRWD vs IVV Performance

Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, FRWD is up 27.34% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FRWD charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRWD currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

FRWD already in IVV56.3%
IVV already in FRWD28.7%

56.3% of FRWD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 28.7% of IVV's money is in holdings FRWD also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

15 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in FRWD and 505 in IVV, against full books of 27 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FRWD (70.7% of the fund), and 5 for FRWD that do not appear in IVV (15.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FRWDWeight in IVVDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.9.24%7.98%1.26%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 373.67%5.44%1.77%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.6.09%1.18%4.91%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc3.24%4.01%0.77%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.76%2.98%0.78%
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.32%3.19%0.13%
LRCXLam Research Corpcommon Stock5.26%0.58%4.68%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.3.13%1.51%1.62%
WDCWestern Digital Corp.3.82%0.27%3.55%
TXNTexas Instruments, Inc.3.59%0.38%3.21%

56.3% of FRWD is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FRWDIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FRWD or IVV?

FRWD has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FRWD and IVV?

56.3% of FRWD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 28.7% of IVV's is in holdings FRWD also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in FRWD and 505 in IVV.

Which pays a higher dividend, FRWD or IVV?

FRWD yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than FRWD?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.