FRWD vs SCHD
Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FRWD or SCHD?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FRWD | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $277M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 27 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +26.54%Best | +24.59% |
| 1Y Return | - | +28.14% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.58% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.90% |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.3% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 13, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FRWD vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FRWD vs SCHD Performance
Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) is an ETF from Nomura Asset Management Co Ltd and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, FRWD is up 26.54% versus a gain of 24.59% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FRWD charges 0.65% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $6 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FRWD currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
3.6% of FRWD's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 3.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings FRWD also owns.
FRWD and SCHD share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in FRWD and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 27 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FRWD (96.8% of the fund), and 18 for FRWD that do not appear in SCHD (68.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FRWD | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXNTexas Instruments, Inc. | 3.59% | 3.13% | 0.46% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FRWD and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FRWD or SCHD?
FRWD has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between FRWD and SCHD?
3.6% of FRWD's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 3.1% of SCHD's is in holdings FRWD also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in FRWD and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FRWD or SCHD?
FRWD yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FRWD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.