FSEV vs VOO
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FSEV or VOO?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FSEV is less concentrated, with 8.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSEV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 390 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +6.82% | +12.74%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.43% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Top 10 Weight | 8.6%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 28, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
FSEV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FSEV vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Value ETF (FSEV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FSEV is up 6.82% versus a gain of 12.74% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSEV charges 0.28% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSEV currently yields 0.27% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of FSEV's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 427 positions we hold weights for in FSEV and 504 in VOO, against full books of 390 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FSEV (99.3% of the fund), and 399 for FSEV that do not appear in VOO (94.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FSEV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AOSAnika Therapeutics Inc | 0.07% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FSEV and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSEV or VOO?
FSEV has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSEV or VOO?
FSEV yields 0.27% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than FSEV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FSEV is less concentrated, with 8.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.