FSML vs VTI

FSML vs VTI

Which is better, FSML or VTI?

Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FSML is less concentrated, with 14.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: FSML

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFSMLVTI
Expense Ratio0.45%0.03%Best
AUM$148M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.39%1.03%
Holdings3063,543
YTD Return+18.27%Best+12.30%
1Y Return-+16.08%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Top 10 Weight14.4%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyFranklin Templeton Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 9, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FSML vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FSML vs VTI Performance

Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FSML is up 18.27% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FSML charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSML currently yields 0.39% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

FSML already in VTI91.3%
VTI already in FSML0.8%

91.3% of FSML's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's money is in holdings FSML also owns.

Most of FSML is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

276 positions in common, counted across the 297 positions we hold weights for in FSML and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 306 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,073 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FSML (96.7% of the fund), and 13 for FSML that do not appear in VTI (5.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FSMLWeight in VTIDifference
TXG10x Genomics Inc Com Usd 1 Cl A1.84%0.01%1.83%
JXNJackson Financial Inc USD1.56%0.01%1.55%
OIIOceaneering Intl Inc.1.51%0.01%1.50%
CNRCore Natural Resources Inccommon Stock1.46%0.01%1.45%
BOXBox Inc - Class A1.40%0.01%1.39%
KFYKorn Ferry1.37%0.01%1.36%
AAMIAcadian Asset Management Inc1.38%0.00%1.38%
WGSGenedx Holdings Corp1.31%0.00%1.31%
TPCTutor Perini Corp1.28%0.01%1.27%
TGTXTg Therapeutics Inc Common Stock1.27%0.01%1.26%

91.3% of FSML is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FSMLVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FSML or VTI?

FSML has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FSML and VTI?

91.3% of FSML's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.8% of VTI's is in holdings FSML also owns. They hold 276 positions in common, counted across the 297 positions we hold weights for in FSML and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, FSML or VTI?

FSML yields 0.39% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than FSML?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FSML is less concentrated, with 14.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.