FTGC vs VXUS
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FTGC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTGC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.98% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3.1B | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.26% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +30.15% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +42.37% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.39% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.64% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 21, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FTGC vs VXUS Performance
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTGC returned +42.37% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, FTGC is up 30.15% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, FTGC compounded at +16.39% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.64% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.5% for FTGC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.6% for FTGC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTGC charges 0.98% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $98 vs $5 annually, a gap of $93 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTGC currently yields 15.26% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FTGC and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7871 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTGC or VXUS?
FTGC has an expense ratio of 0.98% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $93 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTGC or VXUS?
Over the past year FTGC returned +42.37% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so FTGC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FTGC annualized +3.26% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTGC or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.5% for FTGC. Worst drawdown: FTGC -60.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FTGC and VXUS?
FTGC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTGC and VXUS?
FTGC and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7871 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTGC or VXUS?
FTGC yields 15.26% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so FTGC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.