FTIHX vs IVV
Fidelity Total International Index Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FTIHX or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTIHX led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTIHX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | - | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.38% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 5,059 | 508 |
| YTD Price Return | +14.90%Best | +11.91% |
| 1Y Price Return | +19.25%Best | +16.18% |
| 3Y Price Return (annualized) | +16.82% | +19.65%Best |
| 5Y Price Return (annualized) | +5.95% | +11.37%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.5%Best | 15.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.4% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,351 | $17,133Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 7, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Returns are price returns and exclude distributions, because our data feed carries no adjusted close for FTIHX. Both funds are measured the same way, so the comparison holds. FTIHX yields 2.38% and IVV 1.06% on top.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2021 to Sep 11, 2026 (5 years).
FTIHX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5 years both funds cover. Prices exclude distributions, on both funds alike.
FTIHX vs IVV Performance
Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) is a mutual fund from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTIHX returned +19.25% while IVV returned +16.18%. Year to date, FTIHX is up 14.90% versus a gain of 11.91% for IVV.
Over three years, FTIHX compounded at +16.82% per year against +19.65% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.95% and +11.37% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.8% compared with 15.5% for FTIHX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.4% for FTIHX and -25.4% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTIHX charges 0.06% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTIHX currently yields 2.38% against 1.06% for IVV.
Structure and taxes
FTIHX is a mutual fund and IVV is an ETF. A mutual fund prices once a day at net asset value and may carry a purchase minimum. An ETF trades through the day at whatever the market pays for it.
In a taxable account the difference that usually matters is distributions. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely has to sell holdings and rarely passes a capital gain to the people who held it; a mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can distribute a realised gain at year end to everyone still in the fund, whether or not they sold anything themselves. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. Both are descriptions of how the two wrappers work, not a recommendation.
Tax-loss harvesting works on either wrapper.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.7% of IVV's money is in holdings FTIHX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for FTIHX, our book for it covers 94.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 186 days apart, FTIHX as of Jan 31, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
5 positions in common, counted across the 4,981 positions we hold weights for in FTIHX and 505 in IVV, against full books of 5,059 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTIHX and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTIHX or IVV?
FTIHX has an expense ratio of 0.06% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTIHX or IVV?
Over the past year FTIHX returned +19.25% vs +16.18% for IVV, so FTIHX leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTIHX or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.8% annualized versus 15.5% for FTIHX. Worst drawdown: FTIHX -31.4% vs IVV -25.4%.
Should I hold both FTIHX and IVV?
FTIHX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTIHX or IVV?
FTIHX yields 2.38% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FTIHX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is it better to hold FTIHX or IVV in a taxable account?
IVV is an ETF and FTIHX is a mutual fund. An ETF can meet redemptions in kind, so it rarely distributes a capital gain to the people holding it. A mutual fund that sells holdings to meet redemptions can pass a realised gain to every holder at year end. In a tax-deferred account that difference largely disappears. This is information, not a recommendation.
Is IVV better than FTIHX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTIHX led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.