FTMN vs QQQ
Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, FTMN or QQQ?
Municipal Minnesota against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTMN | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $286M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.05% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 194 | 107 |
| YTD Return | -2.40% | +15.94%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.44% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.86% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.26% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Minnesota | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 23, 1989 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTMN vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTMN vs QQQ Performance
Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, FTMN is down 2.40% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTMN charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTMN currently yields 3.05% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 18 holdings in FTMN and 102 in QQQ, totalling 19.6% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 18 positions we hold weights for in FTMN and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 194 and 107.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTMN and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTMN or QQQ?
FTMN has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTMN or QQQ?
FTMN yields 3.05% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FTMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than FTMN?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.