FTMN vs VTI
Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FTMN or VTI?
Municipal Minnesota against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTMN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $286M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.05% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 194 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -2.40% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Municipal Minnesota | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 23, 1989 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FTMN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FTMN vs VTI Performance
Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FTMN is down 2.40% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTMN charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTMN currently yields 3.05% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in FTMN and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 1.9% and 90.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in FTMN and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 194 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTMN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTMN or VTI?
FTMN has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTMN or VTI?
FTMN yields 3.05% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FTMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FTMN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.