FTXG vs QQQ
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTXG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $18M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.32% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.78% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.95% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.59% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
FTXG vs QQQ Performance
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year FTXG returned +5.78% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, FTXG is up 13.32% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, FTXG compounded at +0.95% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.59% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +3.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.3% for FTXG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.8% for FTXG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.37. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTXG charges 0.60% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $18 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTXG currently yields 2.52% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
FTXG and QQQ share 5 holdings out of 127 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTXG or QQQ?
FTXG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTXG or QQQ?
Over the past year FTXG returned +5.78% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FTXG annualized +3.06% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTXG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.3% for FTXG. Worst drawdown: FTXG -33.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both FTXG and QQQ?
FTXG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.37, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTXG and QQQ?
FTXG and QQQ share 5 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 127 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTXG or QQQ?
FTXG yields 2.52% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so FTXG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.