FTXR vs IVV
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTXR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTXR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.1B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +14.97% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.63% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.77% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.02% | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
FTXR vs IVV Performance
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTXR returned +34.63% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, FTXR is up 14.97% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, FTXR compounded at +17.77% per year against +22.08% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.02% and +12.96% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, FTXR has the edge at +9.27% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTXR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.4% for FTXR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTXR charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTXR currently yields 0.98% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FTXR and IVV share 17 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTXR or IVV?
FTXR has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTXR or IVV?
Over the past year FTXR returned +34.63% vs +21.89% for IVV, so FTXR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), FTXR annualized +9.27% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTXR or IVV?
FTXR has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FTXR -53.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FTXR and IVV?
FTXR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTXR and IVV?
FTXR and IVV share 17 common holdings with a 2.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTXR or IVV?
FTXR yields 0.98% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.