FV vs IVV

FV vs IVV

Which is better, FV or IVV?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FV led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFVIVV
Expense Ratio0.89%0.03%Best
AUM$3.8B$876.4B
Dividend Yield0.50%1.06%
Holdings6508
YTD Return+14.05%Best+12.27%
1Y Return+19.03%Best+17.04%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.54%+21.24%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+9.73%+13.08%Best
Volatility (annualized)18.2%14.7%Best
Max Drawdown-34.0%-33.9%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,908$18,490Best
Top 10 Weight-37.8%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 5, 2014May 15, 2000

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 6, 2014 to Sep 17, 2026 (12.5 years).

FV vs IVV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.5 years both funds cover.

FV vs IVV Performance

First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FV returned +19.03% while IVV returned +17.04%. Year to date, FV is up 14.05% versus a gain of 12.27% for IVV.

Over three years, FV compounded at +17.54% per year against +21.24% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.73% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.49% annualized vs +11.20%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 14.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for FV and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FV charges 0.89% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FV currently yields 0.50% against 1.06% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 5 holdings in FV and 490 in IVV, totalling 100.0% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in FV and 490 in IVV, against full books of 6 and 508.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for FV (98.6% of the fund), and 5 for FV that do not appear in IVV (100.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of FV and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

FVIVV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FV or IVV?

FV has an expense ratio of 0.89% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FV or IVV?

Over the past year FV returned +19.03% vs +17.04% for IVV, so FV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FV annualized +11.20% vs +12.49% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FV or IVV?

FV has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 14.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FV -34.0% vs IVV -33.9%.

Should I hold both FV and IVV?

FV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, FV or IVV?

FV yields 0.50% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is IVV better than FV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FV led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.