FV vs VYM
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FV or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FV | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $3.8B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.50% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 6 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +14.05%Best | +12.29% |
| 1Y Return | +19.03%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.54%Best | +17.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.73% | +12.12%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 13.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,908 | $17,718Best |
| Top 10 Weight | - | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2014 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 6, 2014 to Sep 17, 2026 (12.5 years).
FV vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.5 years both funds cover.
FV vs VYM Performance
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FV returned +19.03% while VYM returned +16.61%. Year to date, FV is up 14.05% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.
Over three years, FV compounded at +17.54% per year against +17.42% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.73% and +12.12% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, FV has the edge at +11.20% annualized vs +9.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 13.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for FV and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FV charges 0.89% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $4 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FV currently yields 0.50% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 5 holdings in FV and 557 in VYM, totalling 100.0% and 99.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 5 positions we hold weights for in FV and 557 in VYM, against full books of 6 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 528 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FV (97.1% of the fund), and 5 for FV that do not appear in VYM (100.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FV and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FV or VYM?
FV has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FV or VYM?
Over the past year FV returned +19.03% vs +16.61% for VYM, so FV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), FV annualized +11.20% vs +9.22% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FV or VYM?
FV has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 13.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FV -34.0% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both FV and VYM?
FV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FV or VYM?
FV yields 0.50% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FV?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window, VYM over 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.