FXD vs VTI
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FXD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $273M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 113 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.96% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.58% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.23% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.01% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -65.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 8, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
FXD vs VTI Performance
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FXD returned +4.58% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, FXD is up 1.96% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, FXD compounded at +10.23% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.01% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +6.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FXD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -65.7% for FXD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FXD charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FXD currently yields 0.60% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FXD and VTI share 90 holdings out of 2809 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FXD or VTI?
FXD has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FXD or VTI?
Over the past year FXD returned +4.58% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FXD annualized +6.96% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FXD or VTI?
FXD has been the more volatile fund at 22.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FXD -65.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FXD and VTI?
FXD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FXD and VTI?
FXD and VTI share 90 common holdings with a 4.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2809 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FXD or VTI?
FXD yields 0.60% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.