FXP vs IVV
ProShares Ultrashort FTSE China 50 vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, FXP or IVV?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FXP led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FXP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.20% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 5 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +29.88%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +34.55%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -28.64% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -20.93% | +13.51%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 48.2% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -55.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $3,091 | $18,844Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 8, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.9 years).
FXP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.9 years both funds cover.
FXP vs IVV Performance
ProShares Ultrashort FTSE China 50 (FXP) is an ETF from ProShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FXP returned +34.55% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, FXP is up 29.88% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, FXP compounded at -28.64% per year against +21.38% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -20.93% and +13.51% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.58% annualized vs -28.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FXP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.2% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FXP charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FXP currently yields 3.20% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FXP and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FXP or IVV?
FXP has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FXP or IVV?
Over the past year FXP returned +34.55% vs +16.61% for IVV, so FXP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FXP annualized -28.14% vs +9.58% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FXP or IVV?
FXP has been the more volatile fund at 48.2% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV.
Should I hold both FXP and IVV?
FXP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FXP or IVV?
FXP yields 3.20% while IVV yields 1.06%, so FXP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than FXP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FXP led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.