FXP vs VTI
ProShares Ultrashort FTSE China 50 vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FXP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.55% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +24.80% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +16.66% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -28.52% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -19.42% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 48.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
FXP vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultrashort FTSE China 50 (FXP) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FXP returned +16.66% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, FXP is up 24.80% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, FXP compounded at -28.52% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -19.42% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -28.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FXP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.3% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.9% for FXP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FXP charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FXP currently yields 2.55% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FXP or VTI?
FXP has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FXP or VTI?
Over the past year FXP returned +16.66% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FXP annualized -28.42% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FXP or VTI?
FXP has been the more volatile fund at 48.3% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FXP -99.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FXP and VTI?
FXP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, FXP or VTI?
FXP yields 2.55% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FXP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.