FXP vs VTI
ProShares Ultrashort FTSE China 50 vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FXP or VTI?
Trading-Inverse Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FXP led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FXP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.20% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +29.88%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +34.55%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -28.64% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -20.93% | +12.36%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 48.2% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -55.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $3,091 | $17,908Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 8, 2007 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.9 years).
FXP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.9 years both funds cover.
FXP vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultrashort FTSE China 50 (FXP) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FXP returned +34.55% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, FXP is up 29.88% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, FXP compounded at -28.64% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -20.93% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.49% annualized vs -28.14%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FXP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.2% compared with 16.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FXP charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FXP currently yields 3.20% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FXP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FXP or VTI?
FXP has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FXP or VTI?
Over the past year FXP returned +34.55% vs +16.08% for VTI, so FXP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), FXP annualized -28.14% vs +9.49% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FXP or VTI?
FXP has been the more volatile fund at 48.2% annualized versus 16.1% for VTI.
Should I hold both FXP and VTI?
FXP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, FXP or VTI?
FXP yields 3.20% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FXP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FXP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FXP led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.