GALX vs VYM

GALX vs VYM

Which is better, GALX or VYM?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.3%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGALXVYM
Expense Ratio0.75%0.04%Best
AUM$3M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%2.24%
Holdings61613
YTD Return-0.78%+14.33%Best
1Y Return-+20.01%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.43%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.16%
Top 10 Weight35.3%25.9%Best
Fund FamilyVistaSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionJul 15, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GALX vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GALX vs VYM Performance

VistaShares Space Supercycle ETF (GALX) is an ETF from VistaShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, GALX is down 0.78% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GALX charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GALX currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

GALX already in VYM2.8%
VYM already in GALX0.9%

2.8% of GALX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.9% of VYM's money is in holdings GALX also owns.

GALX and VYM share little of their money.

The two holdings books were reported 50 days apart, GALX as of Aug 19, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

3 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in GALX and 602 in VYM, against full books of 61 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 566 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GALX (96.3% of the fund), and 32 for GALX that do not appear in VYM (59.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GALXWeight in VYMDifference
LHXL3Harris Technologies Inc.1.86%0.22%1.64%
LMTLockheed Martin Corp0.48%0.43%0.05%
NOCNorthrop Grumman Corp.0.46%0.28%0.18%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GALX and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GALXVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GALX or VYM?

GALX has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GALX and VYM?

2.8% of GALX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.9% of VYM's is in holdings GALX also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in GALX and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, GALX or VYM?

GALX yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than GALX?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.