GBXA vs QQQ
Goldman Sachs US Large Cap Buffer 1 ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBXA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $7M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -4.50% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.31% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GBXA vs QQQ Performance
Goldman Sachs US Large Cap Buffer 1 ETF (GBXA) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GBXA returned +9.31% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, GBXA is down 4.50% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.9% for GBXA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for GBXA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBXA charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBXA currently yields 0.34% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GBXA and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 103 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBXA or QQQ?
GBXA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GBXA or QQQ?
Over the past year GBXA returned +9.31% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GBXA annualized +3.38% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GBXA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.9% for GBXA. Worst drawdown: GBXA -12.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GBXA and QQQ?
GBXA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GBXA and QQQ?
GBXA and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 103 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBXA or QQQ?
GBXA yields 0.34% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.