GBXA vs VTI
Goldman Sachs US Large Cap Buffer 1 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBXA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -4.50% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.31% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
GBXA vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs US Large Cap Buffer 1 ETF (GBXA) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GBXA returned +9.31% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GBXA is down 4.50% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.9% for GBXA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for GBXA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBXA charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBXA currently yields 0.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GBXA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBXA or VTI?
GBXA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GBXA or VTI?
Over the past year GBXA returned +9.31% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GBXA annualized +3.38% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GBXA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.9% for GBXA. Worst drawdown: GBXA -12.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GBXA and VTI?
GBXA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GBXA and VTI?
GBXA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBXA or VTI?
GBXA yields 0.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.