GBXA vs VOO
Goldman Sachs US Large Cap Buffer 1 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GBXA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -4.50% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.31% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 30, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GBXA vs VOO Performance
Goldman Sachs US Large Cap Buffer 1 ETF (GBXA) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GBXA returned +9.31% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, GBXA is down 4.50% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.9% for GBXA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.3% for GBXA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GBXA charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GBXA currently yields 0.34% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GBXA and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GBXA or VOO?
GBXA has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GBXA or VOO?
Over the past year GBXA returned +9.31% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GBXA annualized +3.38% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GBXA or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.9% for GBXA. Worst drawdown: GBXA -12.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GBXA and VOO?
GBXA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GBXA and VOO?
GBXA and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GBXA or VOO?
GBXA yields 0.34% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.