GCC vs VTI
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GCC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $270M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.21% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +17.91% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.82% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.21% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.00% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 21, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
GCC vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GCC returned +31.82% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, GCC is up 17.91% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, GCC compounded at +17.21% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.00% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +1.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.0% for GCC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.2% for GCC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCC charges 0.57% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCC currently yields 6.21% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GCC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCC or VTI?
GCC has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GCC or VTI?
Over the past year GCC returned +31.82% vs +22.39% for VTI, so GCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), GCC annualized +1.27% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GCC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.0% for GCC. Worst drawdown: GCC -63.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GCC and VTI?
GCC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GCC and VTI?
GCC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCC or VTI?
GCC yields 6.21% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.