GCC vs VTI
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GCC or VTI?
Commodities against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GCC led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $307M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.33% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 28 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +27.47%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +38.23%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.07% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.14%Best | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 16.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -63.2% | -52.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,373Best | $17,908 |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Commodities | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 21, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 24, 2008 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.7 years).
GCC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.7 years both funds cover.
GCC vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GCC returned +38.23% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, GCC is up 27.47% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, GCC compounded at +19.07% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.14% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +10.16% annualized vs +1.69%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.1% for GCC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.2% for GCC and -52.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCC charges 0.57% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCC currently yields 5.33% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in GCC and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 7.7% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in GCC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 28 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GCC and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCC or VTI?
GCC has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GCC or VTI?
Over the past year GCC returned +38.23% vs +16.08% for VTI, so GCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), GCC annualized +1.69% vs +10.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GCC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.1% for GCC. Worst drawdown: GCC -63.2% vs VTI -52.6%.
Should I hold both GCC and VTI?
GCC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCC or VTI?
GCC yields 5.33% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GCC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GCC led over 1Y and 5Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.