GCC vs VOO
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GCC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $270M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.21% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 37 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +18.19% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.79% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.34% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.14% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.2% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 21, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GCC vs VOO Performance
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GCC returned +32.79% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, GCC is up 18.19% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, GCC compounded at +17.34% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.14% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +1.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.2% for GCC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCC charges 0.57% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCC currently yields 6.21% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GCC and VOO share 0 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCC or VOO?
GCC has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GCC or VOO?
Over the past year GCC returned +32.79% vs +22.62% for VOO, so GCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GCC annualized +1.29% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GCC or VOO?
GCC has been the more volatile fund at 15.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GCC -63.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GCC and VOO?
GCC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GCC and VOO?
GCC and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCC or VOO?
GCC yields 6.21% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.