GDMN vs VYM
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GDMN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GDMN | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $140M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.47% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -2.66% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +68.46% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +68.18% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 47.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 14, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GDMN vs VYM Performance
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund ETF (GDMN) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GDMN returned +68.46% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, GDMN is down 2.66% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, GDMN compounded at +68.18% per year against +18.43% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, GDMN has the edge at +36.61% annualized vs +7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for GDMN and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GDMN charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDMN currently yields 3.47% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GDMN and VYM share 1 holdings out of 613 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GDMN | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEM | 12.55% | 0.63% | 11.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GDMN or VYM?
GDMN has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GDMN or VYM?
Over the past year GDMN returned +68.46% vs +26.05% for VYM, so GDMN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GDMN annualized +36.61% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GDMN or VYM?
GDMN has been the more volatile fund at 47.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GDMN -52.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GDMN and VYM?
GDMN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GDMN and VYM?
GDMN and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 613 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GDMN or VYM?
GDMN yields 3.47% while VYM yields 2.86%, so GDMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.