GDMN vs VTI
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GDMN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GDMN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $182M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.49% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 63 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.84% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +87.91% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +77.54% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
GDMN vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund ETF (GDMN) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GDMN returned +87.91% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GDMN is up 8.84% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, GDMN compounded at +77.54% per year against +21.54% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, GDMN has the edge at +39.69% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for GDMN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GDMN charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDMN currently yields 3.49% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GDMN or VTI?
GDMN has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GDMN or VTI?
Over the past year GDMN returned +87.91% vs +21.39% for VTI, so GDMN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GDMN annualized +39.69% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GDMN or VTI?
GDMN has been the more volatile fund at 49.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GDMN -52.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GDMN and VTI?
GDMN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GDMN and VTI?
GDMN and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2840 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GDMN or VTI?
GDMN yields 3.49% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GDMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.