GDOC vs QQQ
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GDOC | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $19M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 46 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +5.48% | +18.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.37% | +25.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.22% | +25.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GDOC vs QQQ Performance
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GDOC returned +21.37% while QQQ returned +25.37%. Year to date, GDOC is up 5.48% versus a gain of 18.31% for QQQ.
Over three years, GDOC compounded at +5.22% per year against +25.79% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.10% annualized vs -0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.8% for GDOC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for GDOC and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GDOC charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDOC currently yields 0.31% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GDOC and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 140 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GDOC or QQQ?
GDOC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GDOC or QQQ?
Over the past year GDOC returned +21.37% vs +25.37% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GDOC annualized -0.68% vs +13.10% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GDOC or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.8% for GDOC. Worst drawdown: GDOC -31.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GDOC and QQQ?
GDOC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GDOC and QQQ?
GDOC and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 140 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GDOC or QQQ?
GDOC yields 0.31% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.