GDOC vs VTI
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GDOC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 45 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +5.19% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.51% | +21.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.97% | +20.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
GDOC vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GDOC returned +15.51% while VTI returned +21.07%. Year to date, GDOC is up 5.19% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, GDOC compounded at +4.97% per year against +20.54% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.08% annualized vs -0.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDOC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for GDOC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GDOC charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDOC currently yields 0.32% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GDOC and VTI share 27 holdings out of 2799 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GDOC or VTI?
GDOC has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GDOC or VTI?
Over the past year GDOC returned +15.51% vs +21.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), GDOC annualized -0.73% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GDOC or VTI?
GDOC has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GDOC -31.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GDOC and VTI?
GDOC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GDOC and VTI?
GDOC and VTI share 27 common holdings with a 4.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2799 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GDOC or VTI?
GDOC yields 0.32% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.