GDXY vs GIAX
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF vs Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF
Which is better, GDXY or GIAX?
Each has led over a different period.
GDXY has a lower expense ratio. GDXY led over the full window, GIAX over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GDXY | GIAX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00%Best | 1.03% |
| AUM | $274M | $99M |
| Dividend Yield | 83.11% | 27.38% |
| Holdings | 32 | 213 |
| YTD Return | -13.07% | +2.36%Best |
| 1Y Return | -8.81% | +0.62%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 34.6% | 21.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.0% | -21.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $14,750Best | $11,959 |
| Fund Family | YieldMax ETF | XFunds |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | May 20, 2024 | Jul 29, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 30, 2024 to Nov 12, 2026 (2.3 years).
GDXY vs GIAX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
GDXY vs GIAX Performance
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) is an ETF from XFunds. Over the past year GDXY returned -8.81% while GIAX returned +0.62%. Year to date, GDXY is down 13.07% versus a gain of 2.36% for GIAX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GDXY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 34.6% compared with 21.3% for GIAX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.0% for GDXY and -21.2% for GIAX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GDXY charges 1.00% per year while GIAX charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $103 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GDXY currently yields 83.11% against 27.38% for GIAX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GDXY and GIAX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GDXY or GIAX?
GDXY has an expense ratio of 1.00% while GIAX charges 1.03%. GDXY is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GDXY or GIAX?
Over the past year GDXY returned -8.81% vs +0.62% for GIAX, so GIAX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GDXY annualized +18.41% vs +8.09% for GIAX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GDXY or GIAX?
GDXY has been the more volatile fund at 34.6% annualized versus 21.3% for GIAX. Worst drawdown: GDXY -37.0% vs GIAX -21.2%.
Should I hold both GDXY and GIAX?
GDXY and GIAX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GDXY or GIAX?
GDXY yields 83.11% while GIAX yields 27.38%, so GDXY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GIAX better than GDXY?
GDXY has a lower expense ratio. GDXY led over the full window, GIAX over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.