GEME vs QQQ
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GEME delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEME | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $387M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.32% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +29.58% | +17.85% | |
| 1Y Return | +59.21% | +26.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Pacific Global Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 23, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GEME vs QQQ Performance
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF (GEME) is a ETF from Pacific Global Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GEME returned +59.21% while QQQ returned +26.45%. Year to date, GEME is up 29.58% versus a gain of 17.85% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.2% for GEME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for GEME and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEME charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEME currently yields 5.32% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GEME and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEME or QQQ?
GEME has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GEME or QQQ?
Over the past year GEME returned +59.21% vs +26.45% for QQQ, so GEME leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GEME annualized +46.93% vs +13.09% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GEME or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.2% for GEME. Worst drawdown: GEME -16.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GEME and QQQ?
GEME and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GEME and QQQ?
GEME and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEME or QQQ?
GEME yields 5.32% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so GEME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.