GEME vs VTI
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GEME delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GEME | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $387M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.32% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 68 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +29.58% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +59.21% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Pacific Global Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 23, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GEME vs VTI Performance
Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF (GEME) is a ETF from Pacific Global Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GEME returned +59.21% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, GEME is up 29.58% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GEME has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.9% for GEME and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GEME charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GEME currently yields 5.32% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GEME and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2831 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GEME or VTI?
GEME has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GEME or VTI?
Over the past year GEME returned +59.21% vs +23.62% for VTI, so GEME leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GEME annualized +46.93% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GEME or VTI?
GEME has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GEME -16.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GEME and VTI?
GEME and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GEME and VTI?
GEME and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2831 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GEME or VTI?
GEME yields 5.32% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GEME currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.