GF vs VTI
New Germany Fund Inc. vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GF or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $213M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.27% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -0.35% | +12.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.05% | +19.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.01% | +20.86%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -4.36% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.3% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -72.2% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,002 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | DWS ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 1990 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 31, 2001 to Sep 8, 2026 (25.3 years).
GF vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 25.3 years both funds cover.
GF vs VTI Performance
New Germany Fund Inc. (GF) is an ETF from DWS ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GF returned +0.05% while VTI returned +19.17%. Year to date, GF is down 0.35% versus a gain of 12.95% for VTI.
Over three years, GF compounded at +11.01% per year against +20.86% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -4.36% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +3.64%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.2% for GF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GF charges 1.10% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $110 vs $3 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GF currently yields 2.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 51 holdings in GF and 2,788 in VTI, totalling 98.8% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 151 days apart, GF as of Jan 30, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in GF and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 53 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GF or VTI?
GF has an expense ratio of 1.10% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GF or VTI?
Over the past year GF returned +0.05% vs +19.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), GF annualized +3.64% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GF or VTI?
GF has been the more volatile fund at 26.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GF -72.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GF and VTI?
GF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GF or VTI?
GF yields 2.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.