GGRW vs SCHD
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, GGRW or SCHD?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. GGRW led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGRW | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.06% |
| AUM | $8M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 43 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +3.59% | +25.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.78% | +30.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.11%Best | +16.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.31% | +10.17%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.5% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -16.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,579 | $16,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.7% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 16, 2021 to Sep 14, 2026 (5.6 years).
GGRW vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.6 years both funds cover.
GGRW vs SCHD Performance
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year GGRW returned +3.78% while SCHD returned +30.22%. Year to date, GGRW is up 3.59% versus a gain of 25.88% for SCHD.
Over three years, GGRW compounded at +24.11% per year against +16.05% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +6.31% and +10.17% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.71% annualized vs +7.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.5% compared with 14.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for GGRW and -16.9% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGRW charges 0.00% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $6 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGRW currently yields 0.40% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
0.4% of GGRW's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 3.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings GGRW also owns.
SCHD and GGRW share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in GGRW and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 43 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for GGRW (96.8% of the fund), and 39 for GGRW that do not appear in SCHD (96.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GGRW | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.40% | 3.13% | 2.73% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GGRW and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGRW or SCHD?
GGRW has an expense ratio of 0.00% while SCHD charges 0.06%. GGRW is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGRW or SCHD?
Over the past year GGRW returned +3.78% vs +30.22% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GGRW annualized +7.02% vs +11.71% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGRW or SCHD?
GGRW has been the more volatile fund at 21.5% annualized versus 14.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: GGRW -50.3% vs SCHD -16.9%.
Should I hold both GGRW and SCHD?
GGRW and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGRW and SCHD?
3.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings GGRW also owns. 3.1% of SCHD's is in holdings GGRW also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in GGRW and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGRW or SCHD?
GGRW yields 0.40% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than GGRW?
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. GGRW led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.