GGRW vs VYM
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GGRW or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. GGRW led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGRW | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.04% |
| AUM | $8M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.40% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 43 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.59% | +13.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.78% | +17.46%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.11%Best | +17.73% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.31% | +12.22%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.5% | 13.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,579 | $17,797Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.7% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 16, 2021 to Sep 14, 2026 (5.6 years).
GGRW vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.6 years both funds cover.
GGRW vs VYM Performance
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is an ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGRW returned +3.78% while VYM returned +17.46%. Year to date, GGRW is up 3.59% versus a gain of 13.08% for VYM.
Over three years, GGRW compounded at +24.11% per year against +17.73% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +6.31% and +12.22% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +12.99% annualized vs +7.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.5% compared with 13.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for GGRW and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGRW charges 0.00% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGRW currently yields 0.40% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
10.1% of GGRW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 11.4% of VYM's money is in holdings GGRW also owns.
VYM and GGRW share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in GGRW and 557 in VYM, against full books of 43 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 523 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GGRW (85.7% of the fund), and 35 for GGRW that do not appear in VYM (87.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GGRW and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGRW or VYM?
GGRW has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VYM charges 0.04%. GGRW is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GGRW or VYM?
Over the past year GGRW returned +3.78% vs +17.46% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GGRW annualized +7.02% vs +12.99% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GGRW or VYM?
GGRW has been the more volatile fund at 21.5% annualized versus 13.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GGRW -50.3% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both GGRW and VYM?
GGRW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GGRW and VYM?
11.4% of VYM's money is in holdings GGRW also owns. 11.4% of VYM's is in holdings GGRW also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in GGRW and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGRW or VYM?
GGRW yields 0.40% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GGRW?
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. GGRW led over 3Y, VYM over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.