GGRW vs VOO
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
GGRW has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GGRW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $9M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.41% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.62% | +12.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.78% | +20.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.13% | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Gabelli Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 16, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GGRW vs VOO Performance
Gabelli Growth Innovators ETF (GGRW) is a ETF from Gabelli Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GGRW returned +9.78% while VOO returned +20.22%. Year to date, GGRW is up 5.62% versus a gain of 12.38% for VOO.
Over three years, GGRW compounded at +25.63% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.13% and +12.84% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.3% for GGRW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GGRW charges 0.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GGRW currently yields 0.41% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GGRW and VOO share 39 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GGRW or VOO?
GGRW has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. GGRW is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GGRW or VOO?
Over the past year GGRW returned +9.78% vs +20.22% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GGRW annualized +7.48% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GGRW or VOO?
GGRW has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GGRW -50.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GGRW and VOO?
GGRW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GGRW and VOO?
GGRW and VOO share 39 common holdings with a 39.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GGRW or VOO?
GGRW yields 0.41% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.