GIGB vs VOO
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. GIGB offers more diversification with 1613 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GIGB | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $969M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.57% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 2,398 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -0.31% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.67% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.01% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.28% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 6, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GIGB vs VOO Performance
Goldman Sachs Access Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (GIGB) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GIGB returned +1.67% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, GIGB is down 0.31% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, GIGB compounded at +5.01% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.28% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +1.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 7.2% for GIGB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.1% for GIGB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GIGB charges 0.08% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GIGB currently yields 4.57% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GIGB or VOO?
GIGB has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GIGB or VOO?
Over the past year GIGB returned +1.67% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), GIGB annualized +1.08% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GIGB or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 7.2% for GIGB. Worst drawdown: GIGB -23.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GIGB and VOO?
GIGB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GIGB and VOO?
GIGB and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2116 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GIGB or VOO?
GIGB yields 4.57% while VOO yields 1.09%, so GIGB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.