GIND vs VTI
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GIND | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $165M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 122 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -6.39% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.91% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GIND vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GIND returned -4.91% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, GIND is down 6.39% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GIND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for GIND and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GIND charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GIND currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GIND and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2900 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GIND | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTSH | 0.72% | 0.03% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GIND or VTI?
GIND has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GIND or VTI?
Over the past year GIND returned -4.91% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GIND annualized -0.94% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GIND or VTI?
GIND has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GIND -23.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GIND and VTI?
GIND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GIND and VTI?
GIND and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2900 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GIND or VTI?
GIND yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.