GIND vs VTI
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GIND or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. GIND is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GIND | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $158M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 127 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -11.86% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.03% | +15.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.50% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.31% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 11.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $9,293 | $14,478Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.1%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 3, 2025 to Oct 1, 2026 (1.5 years).
GIND vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
GIND vs VTI Performance
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GIND returned -10.03% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, GIND is down 11.86% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GIND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 11.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for GIND and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GIND charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GIND currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of GIND's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, GIND as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 125 positions we hold weights for in GIND and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 127 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GIND (97.4% of the fund), and 6 for GIND that do not appear in VTI (3.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GIND | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A | 0.86% | 0.04% | 0.82% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GIND and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GIND or VTI?
GIND has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GIND or VTI?
Over the past year GIND returned -10.03% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GIND annualized -4.77% vs +27.98% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GIND or VTI?
GIND has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 11.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GIND -23.0% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both GIND and VTI?
GIND and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GIND or VTI?
GIND yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GIND?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. GIND is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.