GIND vs IVV
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GIND | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $165M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 122 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -6.39% | +14.50% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.91% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
GIND vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF (GIND) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GIND returned -4.91% while IVV returned +22.02%. Year to date, GIND is down 6.39% versus a gain of 14.50% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GIND has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for GIND and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GIND charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GIND currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GIND and IVV share 1 holdings out of 622 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GIND | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTSH | 0.72% | 0.03% | 0.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GIND or IVV?
GIND has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GIND or IVV?
Over the past year GIND returned -4.91% vs +22.02% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GIND annualized -0.94% vs +7.07% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GIND or IVV?
GIND has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GIND -23.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GIND and IVV?
GIND and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GIND and IVV?
GIND and IVV share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 622 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GIND or IVV?
GIND yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.