GLDW vs IVV
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GLDW or IVV?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLDW | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 27.52% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 4 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -13.80% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.76% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GLDW vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GLDW vs IVV Performance
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GLDW returned -6.76% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, GLDW is down 13.80% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLDW charges 0.99% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDW currently yields 27.52% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in GLDW and 490 in IVV, totalling 3.6% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in GLDW and 490 in IVV, against full books of 4 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLDW and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLDW or IVV?
GLDW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLDW or IVV?
Over the past year GLDW returned -6.76% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLDW or IVV?
GLDW yields 27.52% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GLDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GLDW?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.