GLDW vs VOO

GLDW vs VOO

Which is better, GLDW or VOO?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns (1Y): VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGLDWVOO
Expense Ratio0.99%0.03%Best
AUM$19M$1.0T
Dividend Yield27.52%1.04%
Holdings8506
YTD Return-20.11%+13.59%Best
1Y Return-13.59%+16.33%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.81%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.02%
Volatility (annualized)32.8%13.2%Best
Fund FamilyRoundhill InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 30, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

GLDW vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GLDW vs VOO Performance

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GLDW returned -13.59% while VOO returned +16.33%. Year to date, GLDW is down 20.11% versus a gain of 13.59% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GLDW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.8% compared with 13.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GLDW charges 0.99% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDW currently yields 27.52% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 1 holding in GLDW and 494 in VOO, totalling 17.2% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, GLDW as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in GLDW and 494 in VOO, against full books of 8 and 506.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GLDW and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GLDWVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GLDW or VOO?

GLDW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GLDW or VOO?

Over the past year GLDW returned -13.59% vs +16.33% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GLDW or VOO?

GLDW has been the more volatile fund at 32.8% annualized versus 13.2% for VOO.

Should I hold both GLDW and VOO?

GLDW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GLDW or VOO?

GLDW yields 27.52% while VOO yields 1.04%, so GLDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than GLDW?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.