GLDW vs QQQ
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GLDW or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GLDW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 27.52% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 8 | 321 |
| YTD Return | -19.95% | +24.32%Best |
| 1Y Return | -13.42% | +25.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +28.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.83% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.8% | 21.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GLDW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GLDW vs QQQ Performance
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF (GLDW) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GLDW returned -13.42% while QQQ returned +25.59%. Year to date, GLDW is down 19.95% versus a gain of 24.32% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GLDW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.8% compared with 21.7% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GLDW charges 0.99% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $18 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GLDW currently yields 27.52% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in GLDW and 102 in QQQ, totalling 17.2% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in GLDW and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 8 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GLDW and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLDW or QQQ?
GLDW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GLDW or QQQ?
Over the past year GLDW returned -13.42% vs +25.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GLDW or QQQ?
GLDW has been the more volatile fund at 32.8% annualized versus 21.7% for QQQ.
Should I hold both GLDW and QQQ?
GLDW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLDW or QQQ?
GLDW yields 27.52% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so GLDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GLDW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.