GMOC vs IVV
GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GMOC or IVV?
Ultrashort Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMOC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $33M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 61 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +2.74% | +12.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.55% | +16.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.21% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Fund Family | GMO | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GMOC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GMOC vs IVV Performance
GMO Ultra-Short Income ETF (GMOC) is an ETF from GMO and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GMOC returned +3.55% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, GMOC is up 2.74% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMOC charges 0.20% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMOC currently yields 3.30% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings GMOC also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GMOC, our book for it covers 27.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in GMOC and 490 in IVV, against full books of 61 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GMOC | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TBBAt&t Inc | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.73% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GMOC and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMOC or IVV?
GMOC has an expense ratio of 0.20% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GMOC or IVV?
Over the past year GMOC returned +3.55% vs +16.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMOC or IVV?
GMOC yields 3.30% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GMOC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GMOC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.