GOCT vs PSMR

GOCT vs PSMR

Which is better, GOCT or PSMR?

PSMR has been ahead.

PSMR has a lower expense ratio. PSMR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: PSMRHigher Returns: PSMR

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGOCTPSMR
Expense Ratio0.85%0.49%Best
AUM$450M$90M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1612
YTD Return+9.10%+11.01%Best
1Y Return+9.99%+12.45%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+11.26%+11.73%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+8.44%
Volatility (annualized)5.7%Best5.9%
Max Drawdown-10.5%Best-11.8%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$14,221$14,439Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Pacer ETFs
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionOct 20, 2023Mar 31, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2023 to Nov 11, 2026 (3.1 years).

GOCT vs PSMR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare GOCT against instead:GOCT vs SPYGOCT vs QQQGOCT vs VOOGOCT vs VTIPSMR against:PSMR vs VXUS

GOCT vs PSMR Performance

FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year GOCT returned +9.99% while PSMR returned +12.45%. Year to date, GOCT is up 9.10% versus a gain of 11.01% for PSMR.

Over three years, GOCT compounded at +11.26% per year against +11.73% for PSMR.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

PSMR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.9% compared with 5.7% for GOCT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.5% for GOCT and -11.8% for PSMR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GOCT charges 0.85% per year while PSMR charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $49 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GOCT currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PSMR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GOCT and PSMR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GOCTPSMR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GOCT or PSMR?

GOCT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while PSMR charges 0.49%. PSMR is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GOCT or PSMR?

Over the past year GOCT returned +9.99% vs +12.45% for PSMR, so PSMR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GOCT or PSMR?

PSMR has been the more volatile fund at 5.9% annualized versus 5.7% for GOCT. Worst drawdown: GOCT -10.5% vs PSMR -11.8%.

Should I hold both GOCT and PSMR?

GOCT and PSMR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, GOCT or PSMR?

GOCT yields 0.00% while PSMR yields 0.00%, so PSMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PSMR better than GOCT?

PSMR has a lower expense ratio. PSMR led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.