PSMR vs VXUS
PSMR vs VXUS
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSMR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $90M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +9.51% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.64% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.39% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.56% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PSMR vs VXUS Performance
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSMR returned +13.64% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, PSMR is up 9.51% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, PSMR compounded at +11.39% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.56% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, PSMR has the edge at +8.87% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.4% for PSMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.8% for PSMR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSMR charges 0.49% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $5 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSMR currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PSMR and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSMR or VXUS?
PSMR has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSMR or VXUS?
Over the past year PSMR returned +13.64% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), PSMR annualized +8.87% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSMR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.4% for PSMR. Worst drawdown: PSMR -11.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PSMR and VXUS?
PSMR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSMR and VXUS?
PSMR and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSMR or VXUS?
PSMR yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.